Call for a professional consult today 734.281.2050

Personal Injury Cases in the News

Personal Injury Cases in the News

The Chicago Tribune recently reported that the Estate of NHL player Derek Boogaard has filed a suit against the NHL attributing his personal injury to its unlawful practices. Specifically, it is alleged that Boogaard regarded as a hockey “enforcer” took up to 10 oxycodone pain killers a day, and that the league knew or should have known, that players with brain damage are at higher risk for drug addiction.

In Michigan, the usual remedy for an injury to a worker is under the Workers’ Compensation Act, MCL 418.131. Under this statute for a work related injury the general rule is that it is the worker’s exclusive remedy. Under the statute there is a trade off in that the worker’s rights to compensation are limited but are insured in that employers defenses of worker’s comparative fault are eliminated. This is true with respect to employer negligence. However, where the employee is able to establish much more than negligence, there is the intentional tort exception to the exclusive remedy rule.

For instance, in McNees v. Cedar Stampings, Co., 184 Mich App 101 (1990) allegations that an employee was injured by a defective foot pedal while operating a stamping press was sufficient to state a claim for intentional tort. That is because the employer was aware of the defect but still ordered the employee to operate the press while knowing that an injury was likely to occur under the circumstances.

If you or a loved one have been injured at work and need legal advice, please feel free to call Guy Vining. All initial consolations are free of charge and all injury cases are handled on a contingency fee basis so that you have no obligation unless you prevail in the case.

Guy Vining practices personal injury law from his Metro-Detroit office in Taylor, Michigan. He has represented clients in personal injury actions for over 25 years in such areas as: car, boat, motorcycle, and truck accidents; slip, trip, and falls including black ice and defective design; medical and dental malpractice, denial of insurance benefits for wages, medical and home assistance to automobile accident victims.

Bankruptcy Cases in the News

Bankruptcy Cases in the News

             The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals (which covers Michigan) issued a very important decision in Richardson v. Schafer, 689 F.3d 601 (6th Cir., 2012). The case is noteworthy because it is of assistance to debtors in their bankruptcy case by allowing them to retain more property.

In this case, the debtor elected to exempt property under the Michigan State Bankruptcy Exemptions instead of the Federal Exemptions. The selection was probably because the debtor had a great deal of home equity protectable as tennants by the entireties (marital home) laws and little joint debt. The trustee, to unlock value for unsecured creditors argued that the Michigan Bankruptcy Exemptions were unconstitutional and that the debtor was only allowed the lesser exemptions provided by the general exemptions statute in Michigan.

The 6th Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed. It held that Michigan debtors were allowed to use either set, i.e., the general exemptions under MCL 600.6023 or the Bankruptcy Exemptions under MCL 600.5451. Generally speaking the latter is more generous to debtors. This allows the debtor to retain more property for his/her fresh start. The bottom line was that the Michigan Legislature did not violate the Constitution by intruding in a Federal law.

Proper exemption planning is critical to a successful outcome in a bankruptcy case. If you or a loved one would like information concerning protection from creditors and obtaining a fresh start, just call Guy Vining. Guy Vining is pleased to discuss your situation confidentially, and without initial charge.

Guy Vining, a bankruptcy attorney, in metro-Detroit, maintains his office in Taylor, Michigan where he serves the downriver communities of Monroe, South Rockwood, Gibraltar, Brownstown Township, Grosse Ile, Woodhaven, Trenton, Southgate, Riverview, Allen Park, Lincoln Park, Dearborn, Dearborn Heights, Westland, Wayne, and Ecorse. If you or a family member of friend would like a no-obligation no cost consultation/financial analysis, just call or E-mail Guy Vining of Vining Law Group, P.L.C to schedule a meeting.]

Personal Injury Cases in the News

Personal Injury Cases in the News

            San Angelo Standard-Times recently reported the settlement of a personal injury which lead to an inmate’s death by suicide. The suit alleged “police misconduct” in that County officials in Lindon County, Nebraska failed to properly monitor the inmate, as they knew or should have known that he was a suicide risk because he was trying to kill himself when arrested.

In Michigan, a constitutional claim against governmental offices may be prosecuted pursuant to 42 USC §1983. A theory of liability sometimes used is that police officers may not be deliberately indifferent to an inmate’s medical needs. Under the statutes, it is illegal under colors of authority to deprive a person of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and other laws. Other types of claims may be predicated upon by Section 1983, such as excessive force, is an arrest and failure to secure needed medical attention. For instance, your writer is aware of one case in which the police knew that the person they arrested had swallowed cocaine to hide it. Despite that the police officer transported the arrestee to the jail instead on an emergency room. A significant settlement was reached after the inmate died from cocaine poisoning.

If you or a family member have a question as to whether your civil rights have been violated by police or other misconduct, call Guy Vining. All initial conferences are free of charge. In addition, these types of matters are handled by the firm on a contingency fee basis, so you will not pay a fee out of pocket. Guy Vining is pleased to assist you, and your interview is completely confidential.

 

Guy Vining practices personal injury law from his Metro-Detroit office in Taylor, Michigan. He has represented clients in personal injury actions for over 25 years in such areas as: car, boat, motorcycle, and truck accidents; slip, trip, and falls including black ice and defective design; medical and dental malpractice, denial of insurance benefits for wages, medical and home assistance to automobile accident victims. His firm sees clients throughout the downriver communities of Rockwood, Gibraltar, Brownstown, Trenton, Grosse Ile, Woodhaven, Riverview, Southgate, Dearborn, Ecorse, Romulus, Taylor, and of course, Wyandotte.

Personal Injury Cases in the News

Personal Injury Cases in the News

 

     The Morning Sun newspaper recently reported that the estate of a Michigan man killed in a fatal crash has filed suit against the negligent driver and two bars at which the driver was earlier a patron. The suit alleges that the driver’s blood alcohol content exceeded the lawful limit by almost three times, being at .20, and the primary cause of his personal injury.

     In Michigan, a statute allows an injured person, or the estate of their decedent, killed by an intoxicated person to bring suit against the intoxicated person and the business that furnished the alcoholic drink.  See: MCL 436.1801. There are many features to the statute which can be troublesome. First, there is a mandatory notice requirement and a shortened statute of limitations. Also, the injured person has a huge burden of proof in establishing that alcohol was sold when it should have been apparent that the person was already visibly intoxicated.  Competent legal assistance is needed to meet these challenges.

     If you, or a loved one, has been injured by an intoxicated driver, or the many other contexts that entail a personal injury, you may have a claim against the establishment that sold him or her alcoholic drinks. Guy Vining will be pleased to have a consultation with you at no charge to discuss your circumstances. Please feel free to call.

Guy Vining practices personal injury law from his Metro-Detroit office in Taylor, Michigan. He has represented clients in personal injury actions for over 25 years in such areas as: car, boat, motorcycle, and truck accidents; slip, trip, and falls including black ice and defective design; medical and dental malpractice, denial of insurance benefits for wages, medical and home assistance to automobile accident victims.

Bankruptcy Cases in the News

Bankruptcy Cases in the News

     Judge Walter Shapero recently issued a written opinion which is instructive to higher income folks considering bankruptcy and their legal counsel. In In re: Rebecca Weinert, the debtor had a monthly gross income which was above the “means test.” Under these circumstances, the debtor would ordinarily not be entitled to relief under Chapter 7 but required a Chapter 13 plan. However, debtor argued that her monthly income, when reduced by monthly payments to her employer to repay personal savings plan loans, was under the local mean income and qualified for relief. Judge Shapero disagreed, ruling that her case would either have to be dismissed or converted to a Chapter 13 for a repayment plan. In his analysis, the Judge stated:

“A case can be dismissed for abuse under §707(b)(1). Abuse is presumed by application of the formula in §707(b)(2)(A)(i), part of which takes into account a debtor’s “currently monthly income” and “monthly expenses.” Incident to that determination, Debtors are required to file the means test form, which shows current income and expenses and the calculations that determine whether or not the presumption arises. “Monthly expenses” are defined in §707(b)(2)(A)(i)(I), (II), (III), (IV), and (V).  However, “current monthly income” is not itself defined in §707(b)(2), but the means test form utilizes income as set forth in Schedule I for these purposes. If a presumption of abuse arises it may only be rebutted by “demonstrating special circumstances,” such as are defined and determined under §707(b)(2)(B)(i), (ii), (iii), and (iv). If a presumption of abuse does not arise or is rebutted, the case may still be dismissed for abuse. In determining abuse in that circumstance, the Court considers (1) whether the case was filed in bad faith and (2) whether the “totality of the circumstances” of the debtor’s financial condition demonstrates abuse.”

     Turning his analysis then to whatever the loan repayment was “another necessary expense,” he concluded that it was not. The repayment was neither a condition of employment, nor did it arise from some unique circumstances. While it was beneficial to debtor to make the repayment to avoid taxes and penalties on an early distribution, the repayment was not mandatory and therefore did not qualify as an appropriate deduction for the calculation of disposable income. As such, the §707(b)(2) trigger for presumption of bankruptcy abuse was pulled, which equals disqualification from eligibility. The court then went on to determine whether there were any unique circumstances to rebut the presumption of abuse. Finding none, the debtor was give the option to dismiss her case or convert to Chapter 13. If you or a loved one are considering whether bankruptcy relief would be helpful for you, please make sure to consult a qualified debt relief agency/attorney. Guy Vining is available for a no-charge initial bankruptcy consultation and would be pleased to meet with you.

Guy Vining, a bankruptcy attorney, in metro-Detroit, maintains his office in Taylor, Michigan where he serves the downriver communities of Monroe, South Rockwood, Gibraltar, Brownstown Township, Grosse Ile, Woodhaven, Trenton, Southgate, Riverview, Allen Park, Lincoln Park, Dearborn, Dearborn Heights, Westland, Wayne, and Ecorse. If you or a family member of friend would like a no-obligation no cost consultation/financial analysis, just call or E-mail Guy Vining of Vining Law Group, P.L.C to schedule a meeting.]

Bankruptcy Cases in the News: Federal and State Exemptions

Bankruptcy Cases in the News

Federal and State Exemptions

     Under the Bankruptcy Court, a debtor may elected between two sets of exemptions in a Chapter 7 case, the Federal exemptions, or (in Michigan) the Michigan exemptions. Generally, the Federal exemptions give the greatest coverage of property to the debtor. Exempt property is property that the debtor gets to keep from creditors and the trustee, which forms the basis of his or her fresh start going forward.

     In certain interesting circumstances, however, the Michigan exemptions are more favorable to the Chapter 7 debtor and should be elected. For instance, under the Federal exemptions, exemptions about $42,000.00 in home equity can be exempted by a married couple. However, if the home is jointly owned as entireties property (husband and wife) either may file individually a bankruptcy and exempt their entire equity, no matter how great, from all individual creditors.

     That is because the historical purposes of the state law favors protecting an innocent spouse from the debts of his or her spouse to preserve their primary residence. This concepts has been explored and defined in several published court decisions. For instance, see: In re: Trickett, 14 Br 85 (Bank W.D. Michigan) 1981; and, In re: Grosslight, 757 F2d 773 (6th Cir. 1985).

     One of the keys to this relief is the absence of joint indebtedness. So, if the non-filing debtor is jointly responsible on some of the incurred debt, the trustee may argue that it should be allowed to administer the estate (sell the martital home) to the extent of the joint obligations. Still, this type of harsh relief must be examined on a case-by-case basis as noted by Judge McIvor in In re: Edwin Harlin, 325 BR 184, 189 (Bank E.D. Mich) 2005:

“As a general rule, courts have been very reluctant to apply 11 USC §363 (h) to allow the sale of entireties property owned by the debtor, and a non-debtor spouse. The case law is well summarized in Collier on Bankruptcy as follows: Disputes over the applicability of a section (h) to tenancies by the entireties have created the largest number of reported cases under section, perhaps because of the unique nature of the ownership interest, the variations among the states as to the nature of the interest and the rather draconian remedy that section 363(h) gives the trustee, contrary to the deep historical roots of the form of title, which is supposed to protect each spouse from the unilateral action of the other… Thus, although generally speaking property held by the debtor as tenant by entirety is subject to sale under section 363(h), courts have erected various obstacles to such sale.”

     This suggests, of course, that married couples should strongly consider never co-signing for the other and avoid all joint debt. Also, they might consider making sure to concentrate payments to reduce and eliminate joint debt as a priority over individual debt, in the ordinary of their payments.

     If you or a loved one are considering whether bankruptcy relief would be helpful for you, please make sure to consult a qualified debt relief agency/attorney. Guy Vining is available for a no-charge initial bankruptcy consultation and would be pleased to meet with you.

Guy Vining, a bankruptcy attorney, in metro-Detroit, maintains his office in Taylor, Michigan where he serves the downriver communities of Monroe, South Rockwood, Gibraltar, Brownstown Township, Grosse Ile, Woodhaven, Trenton, Southgate, Riverview, Allen Park, Lincoln Park, Dearborn, Dearborn Heights, Westland, Wayne, and Ecorse. If you or a family member of friend would like a no-obligation no cost consultation/financial analysis, just call or E-mail Guy Vining of Vining Law Group, P.L.C to schedule a meeting.]

Negligence Cases in the News: Malpractice

Negligence Cases in the News

Personal Injury — Malpractice

In a recent blog we discussed that a common theme in medical malpractice cases is failure to diagnose leading to a significant injury or death. As pointed out, a serious and common gynecological problem which sometimes goes undiagnosed is ectopic pregnancy. When timely to diagnose an ectopic pregnancy can be resolved by a salpingostomy. This is a surgery to remove the fetus from the falliopian tube before it grows so large as to cause a rupture. A ruptured falliopian tube can cause death through internal bleeding and or diminished fertility. Medical literature relates that a pregnancy in the falliopian tube is a true medical emergency and that every attempt should be made to remove the fetus before the tube is damaged.

The doctor or emergency room staff must maintain a high degree of suspicion for ectopic pregnancy in young, sexually active, women who are presenting signs of pain, cramps, bleeding, nausea, and dizziness. These warning sign in conjunction with a detailed history may suggest an abnormal pregnancy. In that case, the pregnancy can be confirmed by simple blood or urine tests. If confirmed, an immediate referral to an OBGYN specialist is called for, as well as an ultrasound, to see if there is, in fact, an abnormal pregnancy.

Ectopic pregnancy (tubal pregnancy) although a true medical emergency, if properly handled, can be successfully treated.

[Guy Vining practices personal injury law from his Metro-Detroit office in Taylor, Michigan. He has represented clients in personal injury actions for over 25 years in such areas as: car, boat, motorcycle, and truck accidents; slip, trip, and falls including black ice and defective design; medical and dental malpractice, denial of insurance benefits for wages, medical and home assistance to automobile accident victims.]

Negligence Cases in the News: Hospital Malpractice Cases

Negligence Cases in the News:

Hospital Malpractice Cases

The Buffalo News reported recently a distressing story. It has been alleged by several citizens that a local hospital caused them to become infected with hepatitis. Specifically, in a suit filed each alleges that the source of the disease was the hospital staff inappropriately reusing surgical needles that had been used on other patients, a definite cause of hospital malpractice.

Generally speaking, it is well known that hospitals, because of ill patients, can be a dirty environment from which a patient can contract a generalized infection. Its a risk, in other words, that can not be eliminated. For this reason, the usual medical negligence or hospital malpractice case will be dismissed, so long as, the hospital is able to establish that it implements industry approved sanitation and sterilization processes.

On the other hand, where a discrete source of infections can be established based upon a violation of industry standards, and then an injured patient may have a cause of action. Certainly if it was proven or admitted that needles were reused without sterilization, that could be a discrete cause of an infection. Another common scenario for either hospital negligence, or even hospital malpractice, is the failure to remove all instruments, bandages, or gauze after a surgery. These foreign objects are many times the source of post surgical failure to heal, pain, and infection.

Guy Vining, an experienced personal injury attorney, in metro-Detroit, maintains his office in Taylor, Michigan where he serves the downriver communities of Monroe, South Rockwood, Gibraltar, Brownstown Township, Grosse Ile, Woodhaven, Trenton, Southgate, Riverview, Allen Park, Lincoln Park, Dearborn, Dearborn Heights, Westland, Wayne, and Ecorse. If you or a family member or friend would like a no-obligation, no cost, consultation/financial analysis, just call or Email Guy Vining of Vining Law Group, P.L.C. to schedule a meeting.

Negligence Cases in the News: Consumer Protection Actions

Negligence Cases in the News:

Consumer Protection Actions

On a “lighter note” Bloomberg has recently reported that lawsuits have been filed against Anheuser-Busch by consumers in several states via the Consumer Protection Actions. Yep, it is alleged that the old “King of Beers” is ripping off consumers because it adds water to the finished product which diminishes the alcohol content. Say it ain’t so!

     In Michigan, the State Legislature enacted the so-called Consumer Protection Act years ago. See MCL 445.901. This act provides for damages and injunctive relief to protect consumers from various types of bait-and-switch, misrepresentations and consumer scams.

     If you or a loved one have any questions about the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, please fee free to call Guy Vining of the Vining Law Group, PLC, for a free consultation.

[Guy Vining practices personal injury law from his Metro-Detroit office in Taylor, Michigan. He has represented clients in personal injury actions for over 25 years in such areas as: car, boat, motorcycle, and truck accidents; slip, trip, and falls including black ice and defective design; medical and dental malpractice, denial of insurance benefits for wages, medical and home assistance to automobile accident victims.]

Personal Injury Cases in the News: Medical Malpractice

Personal Injury in the News:
Medical Malpractice

 

The Toledo Blade recently reported a suit by an Ohio resident against a hospital which allegedly failed to diagnose bleeding in the patient’s skull. The allegation is that the undiagnosed condition resulted in stroke and physical disability.

 

A common type of medical malpractice case is the “failure to diagnose,” or the “failure to monitor” case. The pattern is that illnesses have various abnormal presenting signs which need to be considered through a process of differential diagnosis to determine and treat the cause. The medical professionals are supposed to be acquainted with the various abnormal signs and develop a differential diagnosis of what the cause possibly is and then perform tests to rule them in or out. A missed diagnosis is a very serious matter, and can result in serious injury or death.

 

As an example, consider the condition of ectopic pregnancy. In years past, Guy Vining represnted several victims of this conditions. An ectopic pregnancy is the development of a fetus outside of the uterus, usually into a fallopian tube. The warning signs include swelling and extreme pain in the patient. The risk is extreme, too, because if the fetus is not timely removed, the falliopian tube may rupture leading to the patient’s death by bleeding. The practitioners therefore must have a high index of suspicion for ectopic pregnancy when presented with a young woman and these symptoms. Appropriate care would include taking a history of sexual activity, last menses, ordering a pregnancy test and an ultrasound.

 

As earlier mentioned, if the diagnosis is not made, the rupture can lead to loss of the fallopian tube or even death. If you or a loved one have suffered the loss of a fallopian tube or another serious personal injury because of the failure to make a medical diagnosis, you may have have a compensible loss. Be sure to promptly get advice from a qualified attorney in regard to your personal injury.

 

[Guy Vining practices personal injury law from his Metro-Detroit office in Taylor, Michigan. He has represented clients in personal injury actions for over 25 years in such areas as: car, boat, motorcycle, and truck accidents; slip, trip, and falls including black ice and defective design; medical and dental malpractice, denial of insurance benefits for wages, medical and home assistance to automobile accident victims.]